Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds and a violation of Section 343 of the Penal Code. Extinction of criminal action due to the alleged offender's death
to TIES share price concerning the operating results for the second quarter of 2014 contained a loss due to the cancellation of a TIES construction project. Mr.Assavin used such non-public information
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
operating results showed the net profit of 21.39 million baht due to the fact that JTS awarded a contract from Triple T Broadband Plc. (TTTBB) Such information was therefore crucial to the JTS share prices
) Mr. Sakesan Baisak and (3) Mr. Partheep Chinsangtip jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
(2) Mr. Sakesan Baisak and (3) Mr. Partheep Chinsangtip jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
. Patiphat Supasirisin and (3) Mr. Partheep Chinsangtip jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained
convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's