consideration that {A} failed to perform his duties responsibly with professional due care when he accepted the investor’s assignment to make trading decisions for the investor. Consequently, {A} was deemed to

misconduct above – taking the investor’s assignment to make decisions on trading of securities and derivatives and fabricating that certain derivatives trading orders were sent by the investor – was deemed

ชื่อผู้ได้มา/จำหน่าย :?TUNTEX DISTINCT CORPORATION | ประเภทหลักทรัพย์ : หุ้น | วันที่มีหน้าที่ : 19/11/2546

Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246, 274, 275, 296, 298 and 312 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. As Kittipat committed several distinct and different offences

payment of subscribed shares as the consideration of the assignment of participation interests in Draugen Field and Gjøa Field in Norway to pay to Shell in accordance with the agreements regarding the

paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that Zipmex has been failing to report a summary of the assignment of other persons to perform

distinct and different offences. The defendants were convicted according to Section 91 of the Penal Code. As defendants had made confession, which was beneficial to the case, the Court commuted the

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

No. WHAUP-CS021/2017 2 October 2017 Subject: Notification of Information Memorandum of Related Party Transaction in Relation to Share Purchase and Taking Assignment of Claims in Loan To: President