procedures as specified in the notification. In this regard, Bitazza insufficiently provided the system to ensure that Bitazza could know and verify the true identity of its customers, including acquiring
Bitazza could know and verify the true identity of its customers, including acquiring adequate information for customers’ risk assessment. DAB Act S.94 in conjunction with 30 Settlement Committee Meeting
Mr. Tanat Plengsrisuk Mr. Tanat Plengsrisuk allowed Mr. Tikhamporn Plengsrisuk (his father), to use his securities trading account to conceal identity of Mr. Tikamporn on 14 May 2020 who was knew or
opened without requiring additional identity verification. In addition, Bitazza provided essential operational systems to Bitazza Global. The aforementioned actions by Bitazza Global and Bitazza are deemed
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. The company was dissolved. Therefore, the public prosecutor could not further the case. DV Act S.16 and Section 343 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Section
, Bitazza's advertisement review process was inadequate. As a result, advertisements published during this period contained contents that could encourage or imply guaranteed returns from investments in
showed prices and trading volumes that is not actually occur during 2021 - 2022. Such information disclosure could mislead investors about the actual trading volumes or prices. This case is in the process
sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead