ordering the defendants to jointly reimburse the execution cost to the plaintiff. 26/02/2018 filed a lawsuit to a civil court24/10/2017 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a
Bill of Exchange (B/E) due at the end of the year 2016. Such knowledge considered as a material fact that negatively affects the price of IFEC securities. He took advantage of other investors by
, in May 2017, that the estimated cost of PPC&PPE project was relatively different to the actual cost. That led to SRICHA experienced the net loss of 93.32 million Baht in the 2nd quarter of 2017
and disseminated false statements, which caused an impact on the GL securities price and investors’ investment decisions. Such information also contradicted the information GL had disclosed through the
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP