, which considered that such operation did not reach the standards as a professional required to perform, and failed to deliver services in quality. DAB Act S.94 in conjunction with 30 Settlement
(“TIES”) (now known as “T”) shares between 2010-2012 which when combined with TIES shares held by his spouse and his minor child caused his aggregate holding of TIES shares reached or passed five percent
”) shares on October 13, 2014 which when combined with TIES shares held by her spouse and her minor child caused her aggregate holding of TIES shares reached or passed five percent of the total number of
offerors failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as they did not deliver the offer document (“Form
failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as they did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4
by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as the offerors did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4”) to the shareholders of
with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as the offerors did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4”) to the
procedures for trading digital assets (trading rules) approved by the SEC. Also, the suspension did not comply with the standards as a professional required to perform and was the failure to deliver services
that the group of offerors were made aware of their duties and responsibilities to deliver a complete Form 247-4 to the shareholders, which is in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535