company is licensed to operate derivatives business. Later, the company took possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal
Miss Keswarang Sawatdipan Miss Keswarang Sawatdipan dishonestly deceived the investors by asserting false statements to make invetors believe that she was licensed to operate a derivatives business
channel, and presented themselves as offering such service in the normal course of business outside the digital asset exchanges. The action constitutes operating digital asset dealing business without a
, contravening Section 343 of the Penal Code. On September 27, 2017, The Supreme Court ruled that the accused operated unlicensed securities business in the name of BENSON DUPONT in violating section 90 of SEA and
a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the
multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision carrying the heaviest punishment, namely, the offense of operating a digital asset
violating multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision carrying the heaviest punishment, namely, the offense of operating a digital
Miss Kittiya Utokyota During the period of 29 July 2021 to 31 March 2022 (totaling 167 business days), a group of eight individuals, namely – (1) Mr. Boon-aue Chitthanom, (2) Miss Kittiya Utokyota