. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the
Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992) (“SEC Act”) instructing the directors of EARTH to provide explanation about the reasonability of private placement, the company and shareholders’ best
shareholders’ best interest regarding the private placement, effects to share price and shareholder control, reasons of offering shares of EARTH at a price of 0.0001 Baht per share, consideration of book value
17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act violating
under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act
the reasonability of private placement, the company and shareholders’ best interest regarding the private placement, effects to share price and shareholder control, reasons of offering shares of EARTH