later entirely cancelled. His intention in placing selling orders was to test the market, without intention to execute transactions, in such a way that misleads other persons regarding the price or

Miss Panida Trongthammakit During the period of 1 March 2559 to 12 Mpermitting himnd During the period of 25 May 2559 to 10 August 2559 (morning), Miss Panida Trongthammakit aid and abet Mr. Winai

Miss Kanyarat Trongthammakit During the period of 25 May 2559 to 10 August 2559 (morning), Miss Kanyarat Trongthammakit aid and abet Mr. Winai Tiaosomboonkij by permitting to use her own securities

Miss Woranart Wangsomboondee During the period of 25 May 2559 to 10 August 2559 (morning), Miss Woranart Wangsomboondee aid and abet Mr. Winai Tiaosomboonkij by permitting to use her own securities

accounting, to falsify documents about financial aid from Coke in order to record as revenue, resulting in increase of profits in the financial statements for the year 2002 of DAIDO. In addition, he colluded

DAIDO chairman, to falsify documents about financial aid from Coke in order to record as revenue, resulting in increase of profits in the financial statements for the year 2002 of DAIDO. In addition, he

(or in the other name as Mr. Wuttipong Rattananon) aid and abet Mr. Winai Tiaosomboonkij by permitting to use his own securities trading account in purchasing TFG’s share or purchasing TFG’s share

the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act

the company. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06/2010