executive of SUPER, had an access to the material information by virtue of being assigned by SUPER to contact and coordinate with SCCC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry

a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the

a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the

to the public and they have access by virtue of their office or position. PCL, Mr. Pranay and Mr. Manish jointly use the inside information to instruct PAPL to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in PAPL’s

to the public and they have access by virtue of their office or position. PCL, Mr. Pranay and Mr. Manish jointly use the inside information to instruct PAPL to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in PAPL’s

to the public and they have access by virtue of their office or position. PCL, Mr. Pranay and Mr. Manish jointly use the inside information to instruct PAPL to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in PAPL’s

been disclosed to the public and she has access by virtue of her office or position. Mrs. Supritha sends orders to buy 7,940,100 shares of PTL in Polyplex (Asia) Pte. Ltd. (“PAPL”)’s securities trading

review responsibility of her audit group. She had the authorized access to view the draft financial statements in the EY information system and disclosed the inside information of the three companies to

Mr.Viroj Patcharawattanakul Mr.Viroj Patcharawattanakul is legally presumed to have knowledge or possession of inside information, and able to access inside information relating to the AAPICO Hitech

channels for the public to access Bitazza Global’s services through Bitazza’s website and mobile application. When customers registered for the service via Bitazza, an account with Bitazza Global would be