found that on October 3, 2012, {A} {B} and {C} had colluded to trade TPC shares through their own securities trading accounts and the accounts of {D} and {E}. The trading was done in the manner that

manager that she had obtained such authorization and decided to trade by the instruction of clients? appointee or by her own deliberation. For a long period of time, she continually made trading decisions

trade securities in the client's account without permission in order to achieve better performance.      {A}'s actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

certain group of persons had their trading orders, on a continual basis, executed through trading accounts of other persons to lure the public to trade such shares as well while in fact the persons who

such information from their positions as CEO and chief finance officer, respectively. The information was about allowance for doubtful account on trade accounts receivable resulting in TUCC operating

inside information to trade CMO shares along with failure to report the changes of his CMO shareholding and launch a tender offer for CMO shares.With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the

trading period to be inconsistent with normal market conditions to mislead other persons that CHUO shares were in high demand at the time and lure them to trade such shares accordingly. His offense was in

securities trading account to trade securities for others and accepting authorization to make securities trading decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(1) and (2) of the Notification of

securities trading orders from persons being neither account owner nor account owner's appointee; and failing to keep a complete record of trade order instructions; in violation of Clause 20(2) and (3) of the

indicated that {B} had obtained authorization to trade gold futures for the client. The client then acknowledged and accepted the trading as reported by him without any enquiries.  The acts of {A} and {B