the debt owed by Mr. Suthat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's auditor into believing that the debtor

records to be inaccurate and inconsistent with the facts. In arranging for falsification of the IEC financial statements; Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Chanchai made up fake documents and partially paid for the debt

and partially paid for the debt owed by Mr. Sutat, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's auditor into believing that

and partially paid for the debt owed by Mr. Sutat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's auditor into believing that

made up fake documents and partially paid for the debt owed by Mr. Sutat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan, to mislead the company's auditor into

up fake documents and partially paid for the debt owed by Mr. Suthat Suklert, who had agreed to take on the debt for Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Ms. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, to mislead the company's

ratio was also close to the target of 42.31 percent. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced

แต่ต้นปีบัญชีถึงไตรมาสล่าสุดด้วย และให้เปิดเผยอัตราส่วนทางการเงิน* ดังนี้ (1) อัตราส่วนหนี้สินสุทธิต่อก าไรก่อนดอกเบี้ยจ่าย ภาษีเงินได้ค่าเสื่อมราคา และค่าตัดจ าหน่าย (net debt to EBITDA ratio) (2

เสื่อมราคา และค่าตัดจ าหน่าย (net debt to EBITDA ratio) (2) อัตราส่วนความสามารถในการช าระดอกเบี้ย (interest coverage ratio) (3) อัตราส่วนความสามารถในการช าระภาระผูกพัน (debt service coverage ratio) (4

Accounts payable days 44 50 43 49 Cash cycle (days) 38 35 38 42 Liquidity and Leverage Ratios Current ratio (times) 0.61 0.57 0.61 0.57 Total debt to equity (times) 1.98 2.38 1.98 2.38  The Company’s