(RPC) that may be materially misleading about JCKH and RPC in such a manner that is likely to affect the price of JCKH and RPC shares or decision making on JCKH and RPC shares investment. Moreover, Mr
the shareholding proportion of Mr. Khanist that was not current. Accordingly, NEX disclosed information by concealing the facts that should be stated regarding the proportion of NEX's shares held
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
resulting in Kitha becoming a subsidiary of ADAM with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti
with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating
convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's
convincing fact that IFEC paid the payment of 60 million baht to purchase the land and building. Even though, due to the partial payment of 20 million baht provided for Mr.Sittichai and Mr.Apichart's