's system for categorizing customers and offering debentures according to the customer classification, as well as its supervision were insufficiently stringent because CL did not inspect that the
operations of JKN at the time of the incident. He failed to issue orders or take actions that were his duty to perform in the case where JKN, as a listed company, was obligated to disclose documents or
assets with fees. It also solicited and promoted its services to the public via the social media channels of Bitazza in Thai language on May 25, 2023. Certain privileges were granted to customers residing
digital assets with fees. It also solicited and promoted its services to the public via the social media channels of Bitazza in Thai language on May 25, 2023. Certain privileges were granted to customers
business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the
offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
were arranged by Mr. Saran. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 and section 352 353 and 354 of Penal Code in conjunction with section
significantly higher price of 70 million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew Pariswong, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat Bhudithaiyarasak, who were Energy System