continuous trading activities. Examples include sending trading orders in a manner that pushed prices upward, placing bid offers at multiple price levels in a way that obstructed and pressured other investors
course of business and charging fees. Also, there was no evidence indicating that purchase or sale orders were routed through any digital asset exchange. Instead, such activities were conducted outside any
incident, was responsible for the operation of Bitazza. His failure to perform the required duties of his position resulted in the offence committed by Bitazza concerning the case that during May 25, 2025
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
resulting in Kitha becoming a subsidiary of ADAM with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti
with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating