Operating Fee for trade mark in China and the change on accounting record of the audit fee expense etc.  Finance Cost Q1/2019, the Company and its subsidiaries had the financial cost 1.1 MB decreased by 1.8

energy costs. Total expenses were Baht 426.8 million, increased by 7.1% mainly due to writing-off obsolete assets caused by the temporary shutdown of furnace for scheduled maintenance. Expense for the

, there is income and cost specifically for the part of representation and domestic transportation activities only. The comparison between combination of such two companies’ income and the previous year

Equity market trading volume comparing with the second quarter of 2018, and the share of loss from KT ZMICO’s associated company. However, KT ZMICO’s operating expense went down from last year as a result

quarter of 2018 Second quarter of 2017 Increased (Decreased) Amount % 1.1 Revenues from construction Baht 2,199.81 million Baht 2,032.79 million Baht 167.02 million 8.22 1.2 Cost of construction 93.53

distribution expenses + Administrative expenses) / Total revenues from sales EBIT margin (%) = (Profit before income tax expense + Finance Cost) / Total revenues from sales EBITDA margin (%) = (Profit before

3Q2018, decreased by THB 89.36 million or 11.24% down from 3Q2017 affected by increasing in cost of sales. The consolidated gross profit margin contributed of 15.63% in 3Q2018, decreased from 18.08% in

and space usage expense of production unit. Major part of cost of sales is raw materials. Gross Profit Gross Profit Margin +48% +67% Q4/2022 vs Q4/2021YoY • Gross Profit in Q4/2022 was THB 166 million

increase in revenue. However, the gross profit margin has dropped from the previous year mainly due to the increase in cost from the Company, which started fully realizing the depreciation from the new

in brokerage fee, fee and service income and other revenue on lower market trading volume and fluctuated market condition, Krungthai ZMICO was able to strategically control cost and improve operational