2019, (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, (4) Floyd Public Company Limited (FLOYD) on 20 December 2019 between 10.05.35 a.m. and 11.56.02 a.m., and (5) Raja

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about

/5 and 244/6, as the case may be, subject to the liabilities under Sections 296, 296/1 and 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the

market condition, misleading other investors that the securities were in great demand, are deemed a violation of Sections 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) in conjunction

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA)*, while {A}, the most senior executive who was responsible for the company's business operation, was involved in those misconducts and failed to perform supervisory duties

trading. The aforesaid actions of Shine were in contravention of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

falsification and false accounting record in violation of Sections 281/2, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Wichai was sentenced to serve 20-year imprisonment and

Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The audit committee twice reported that no wrongdoing was found and that the inadequacies in TUCC?s internal control, without any sign of fraud. The SEC probed into the case

Sections 300, 306, and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) (as the case may be)*.As a result of the review of Mr. Nantawat’s audit work performed for the financial statements for