-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the

Director-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on

for the year 2012 (Form 56-1) to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. On March 26, 2014, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56 and Section 274

, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307

, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307

action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308

. SEC Act S.89/7 and Section 281/2 paragraph 2 and Section 307 308 311 312 and 83 of Criminal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 20/04/2017

and Section 281/2 paragraph 2 and Section 307 308 311 312 and 83 of Criminal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 20/04/2017

and Section 281/2 paragraph 2 and Section 307 308 311 312 and 83 of Criminal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 20/04/2017

. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official.. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 and 89/7 281/2 and section 352 353 and 354 of Penal Code in conjunction with section 91 of Penal