offering price designated by shareholders and is the market price. In consideration of the market price, the Company used the volume weighted average price of the Company’s shares traded on the SET during
ผลกระทบ 1 มูลค่าการซื้อขายเฉลี่ยต่อวัน (Average daily transaction value) *ข้อมูลในช่วงวันที่ 1 ตุลาคม 2564 – 30 กันยายน 2565 - 0 ล้านบาท L 1 2 มูลค่าทรัพย์สินของลูกค้าทั้งหมดที่อยู่ภายใต้การบริหารจัดการ
= (Net profit + Depreciation)/ Average (Q2 2018 and Q4 2017) of property, plant and equipment Mr. Geza Perlaki Mr. Krishnan Subramanian Aylur Authorized Director Authorized Director หน่วย: ล้านบาท Q4 YTD
equivalents 2) Leverage Q2 and FY use annualized EBITDA 3) ROFA = (Net profit + Depreciation)/ Average (Q4 2019 and Q4 2018) of property, plant and equipment Mr. Geza Perlaki Mr. Krishnan Subramanian Aylur
increased mainly from increase in revenue greater than cost. The cost of fuel material, natural gas which is the main production cost, increased from both the consumption and the average gas price, resulting
products and content to cater to market trends and to spur higher Average Order Value (AOV) and improve sales • Renegotiated new freight prices through alternate supplier and packing optimization resulting
EBITDA (%) 40.4% 45.4% Quick ratio (times) 0.8 0.7 Cash-to-net profit (%) 99.2% 96.4% Account receivable turnover (times) 4.9 4.3 Net profit (excl. NCI) (%) 23.9% 20.3% Average collection period (days
liability of Bt88,108mn lined up toward 2020, net debt to EBITDA remained at 1.4x with average cost of debt at 3% p.a. Cash Flow In 9M17, AIS generated operating cash flow (after tax) of Bt46,762mn, which
by THB 127.9 mm or 40.3% from the same period of last year. This was mainly attributable to, during this quarter the Company had transferred the land, having higher average selling price compared to
E_1 Legal_FA_2015_12_29-c A FFeeCCoorrppLL44..11hhiigg A Executive Summary Management Discussion and Analysis For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2017 The Thai economy maintained steady growth in the third quarter of 2017, buoyed largely by tourism and exports. Nonetheless, the economic recovery was not broad-based, as evidenced by sluggish private consumption. While certain businesses were still fragile, others remained mired in uncertainty in terms of new modes of competition, a broader market...