offences under Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2, Section 307, Section 308, Section 311, Section 312 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83
Information Transmission System. Such misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the
learned of such facts from his positions at SLC.His actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act
action by placing trading orders through other persons? trading accounts and making payment for such transactions.Swake?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
their trading accounts and facilitating financial transactions via the accounts.{A}'s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); while {B} and {C}'s
cases where service providers exchange digital assets in a manner that constitutes operating a business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) without a
amount of 37,849.00 Baht SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section Section 242(1) and in conjunction with Section 244(3) Civil Action Dated 13/03/2025
Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2
November 13, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court