. The activities were liable to violate Section 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties

of Mr. Prakorn Makjumroen constituted offences under Section 312 and Section 281/2, Paragraph 2, in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/24 of the Securities

, and securities depository center in accordance with Section 206 and Section 222 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).* The Meeting also approved the principles for amending the

addition to him, Chanchai and Onpimon were also involved in the act as aiders.In this regard, Chupong, Chanchai and Onpimon were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of

aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed

AGM. According to the consideration of the Department of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon?s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public

operating digital asset business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) without license in contravention of Section 26, subject to penalties under Section 66 of

prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and

of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of

of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551