order; however, its juristic person representative has evaded the arrest and has been pursued for case proceedings. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/03/2004

issued a prosecution order; however, the alleged offender has evaded the arrest and has been pursued for case proceedings. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/03/2004

prosecution order; however, the alleged offender has evaded the arrest and has been pursued for case proceedings. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/03/2004

prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the accused failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18/07/2006

the company. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

. Later, she took possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal Code. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order

statements for the year 2008 and the annual registration statement for the year 2008 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to

advanced procurement of raw materials with Union Gas and Chemicals Co., Ltd. in 2004, and made a false representation of accounting information. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case

financial statements for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the offender

16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). พนักงานอัยการมีคำสั่งฟ้องแต่ไม่สามารถนำตัวผู้ต้องหายื่นฟ้องต่อศาลได้ The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however