to other out-of-control wallets without client’ instructions. That actions incurred losses to others and public in violation of Section 85 of Digital Asset Businesses Law. It also violated Section 87

and could not act on behalf of POLAR in any operation of the company.Later, the SEC was informed that a group of POLAR shareholders jointly exercised their rights under Section 100 of the Public

public. The said action was in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court

affect POLAR investors and shareholders. In this regard, POLAR's failure to comply with the order of the SEC is liable to contravention of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992

) TPIPL for disseminating information not included in the draft prospectus, in contravention of Section 77 and Section 239 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Later, Chienchuang

 {X1} Company shares in his own securities trading account by using the aforementioned information learnt during his directorship in {X1} Company. {A} and {B}'s actions were in violation of Section 241

Bangkok, July 14, 2014 ? The SEC is seeking public comment on the draft regulations to be issued under Section 315/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) on payment of bounty and

the aforementioned information learnt from her position of TUCC chief finance officer. Yongyuth and Vorapin?s actions were in violation of Section 241 which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of

quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of

dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section