approval on behalf of the company, had collusively sought unlawful gain causing damage to BLISS. They decided or proceeded for BLISS?s assets to invest in share warrants of C.I.Group Public Company Limited
another person. Further investigation revealed that similar dishonest acts had been committed earlier as Atchima had also taken similar exams for Laddawan, Orapin, {A} and other persons at the total of 15
STP&I Plc. (STPI)?s shares using inside information. With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), the SEC investigation revealed that Choavalit, Yanyong and Ziriwat had purchased STPI
client had ordered to sell 50,000 shares at 19 baht per share on February 25, 2014 but {A} instead submitted the selling orders for 49,000 shares at 17.50 baht per share. {A} admitted doing such action
PLC. and the SEC that the client gave him the username and password for submitting the trading orders as the client had just started investing and not familiar with the Internet trading program.Making
}, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A} persuaded his client to invest in derivatives contracts by exaggerating return from investment. He had prepared his own documents for giving
. The SEC therefore reviewed Ms. Sulalit’s audit work performed for Renaissance FMC and found that she had seriously failed to comply with auditing standards. The deficiencies included: Failure
; digital assets in Z Wallet had been transferred to the destination digital wallets overseas even before Zipmex Thailand notified changes to the terms and conditions of its services, which did not align with
information by knowing that PPPM had insufficient liquidity to repay principal and interest of the Debenture No.2. The published information may mislead investors about PPPM’s materiality information that is