development and recognition of the provision of damages from litigation case which the civil court ordered the sentence in the third quarter of 2022. Finance costs Q3-2021 Q2-2022 Q3-2022 9M-2021 9M-2022 THB Mn

investment. When compare Q4– 2022 to Q4– 2021, it found that there was a provision for loss based on the value obtained from the fair value measurement using the discounted cash flow model that adjusted in the

project development. Furthermore, in the year 2022, the Group also recognised the provision of damages from civil case which the civil court ordered the sentence and loss from impairment of assets. Finance

which was recorded in 4Q22. Bad debt provision as % of postpaid and FBB revenue declined from 2.6% to 2.4% following the economic recovery. Classification: Internal 1Q23 MD&A Advanced Info Service Plc. 4

campaigns. • Admin & other expenses at Bt3,736mn, decreased -3.0% YoY due to a reduction in depreciation of right-of-use assets and decreased by -8.6% QoQ due to cost controls. The provision of bad debts, as

efficiently managed around 8.3% of total revenue. The provision of bad debts as a % of postpaid and broadband revenue was 2.3% lower than 2Q23 at 2.4%. Profitability 3Q23 EBITDA was at Bt23,674mn, increasing

% 14.74 0.56% (15.41) (51.12%) Lease liabilities 102.88 3.98% 82.91 3.14% (19.98) (19.42%) Non-current provision for employee benefit 70.88 2.74% 68.19 2.58% (2.69) (3.79%) Long-term provisions 9.75 0.38

PowerPoint Presentation THE INNOVATIVE POWER FLAGSHIP OF PTT GROUP MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS MD&A Q2/2019 PAGE 1 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS (MD&A) Q2 2019 For Q2/2019, the EBITDA of the company was at Baht 5,402 million, increased by Baht 3,273 million or 154% from Q1/2019, and increased Baht 3,771 million or 231% from Q2/2018. this is mainly due to the immediate recognition of GLOW’s performance after the acquisition of GLOW including Independent Power Producer (IPP), Small Power P...

DB_Part1  ”π—°ß“π§≥–°√√¡°“√°”°—∫À≈—°∑√—æ¬å·≈–µ≈“¥À≈—°∑√—æ¬å µÿ≈“§¡ 2547 §Ÿà¡◊Õ°√√¡°“√∫√‘…—∑®¥∑–‡∫’¬π ‡≈à¡ 1 ∫∑∫“∑ Àπâ“∑’Ë ·≈–§«“¡√—∫º‘¥™Õ∫¢Õß ç°√√¡°“√é ·≈– ç§≥–°√√¡°“√é  à«π∑’Ë 1 À≈—°°“√∑—Ë«‰ª . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. ¡“√Ÿâ®—° ç°√√¡°“√é ¢Õß∫√‘…—∑®¥∑–‡∫’¬π . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 °√√¡°“√ §◊Õ„§√  ”§—≠Õ¬à“߉√ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 °√√¡°“√ °—∫À≈—°°“√∫√√…—∑¿‘∫“≈∑’Ë¥’ . . . . . . . . . . . 2. ç°√√¡°“√é §«√ªØ‘∫—µ‘Àπâ“∑’ËÕ¬à“߉√ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 Àπâ...

26.9 percent, mainly from personnel expenses. This was to prepare for an increase in provision due to compensation in lieu of notice in the case of retirement and dismissal of employees according to a