impact analysis and assess potential damages arising from major operational disruptions to ensure prioritization of systems, processes and resources required for effective recovery of business operations
Code, as the case may be. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against the individuals with the DSI for consideration of further legal proceedings. In addition, the SEC has reported this
with them. Some even gave authorization for the companies? staff to submit trading orders on their behalf.The said actions were deemed as undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention
”; (9) Mr. Varut Vanichayakosol, through Facebook Page: “Insight On-Chain: ส่องข้อมูลออนเชน” and Line OpenChat named: “Insight On-Chain มาคุยกัน”. The actions of these nine individuals increased
– became effective. As a result, the Filing Form did not include an analysis of the impact from the dividend payment, causing ETL’s value and IPO price not to reflect actual events.ETL’s actions above are
CoinEx and more public interest in its services. The actions of CoinEx and Puttipong were liable to be a collusion to undertake a digital asset exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency
conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Civil Sanction Committee has resolved to authorize the SEC to initiate civil sanction proceedings against the 13 offenders, requiring each to pay civil penalty
of Section 307, 311 in conjunction with 313 of SEA. His actions in (2) and (3) were deemed divisible offence. The Court, according to Section 90 of the Penal Code, inflicted the punishment on Suradej
cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the