by a group of persons during July 21 - August 20, 2008, the SEC probed into the case and found that {A} {B} {C} {D} {E} and four other accomplices had colluded to trade UKEM shares through seven

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535(1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code.  The DSI and public prosecutors probed into the case and decided to pursue charges against them

securities trading account and failure to keep complete record of the securities trading orders.Following the report of Capital Nomura Securities PLC, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A

failed to inform a client of material information that was likely to affect investor's interests.Following the SCB report, the SEC probed into the case and found that a client wanted to sell investment

on behalf of clients.Following the report of Kasikorn Securities Plc., the SEC probed into the case and found that {A} had been authorized by two clients to make derivatives and securities trading

filed by KKTRADE Securities Company Limited Ltd. The SEC probed into the case and found that {A} submitted securities trading orders from her brother's securities trading account. Over 11 months, the

securities and trading securities on behalf of clients. Following a client complaint report filed by Maybank Kim Eng Securities (Thailand) Plc., the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A} advised

client during the performance of duties.   From a report of Finansia Syrus Securities Plc, the SEC further probed into the case and found that {A} submitted securities trading orders before notifying a

information of Montri Fund scheme and fund prospectus, the SEC probed into the case and found that he inaccurately specified the age of a building purchased by Montri Fund which was, in fact, many years older

: Following the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET)?s report on irregular trading of TRAF shares from November 15, 2007 to January 9, 2008, the SEC probed into the case and found that Lalana, Sippakorn, then