approval for the above matters with respective supporting reasons and the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the information and
benefits and shortcomings as well as the potential impacts on the bondholders both in cases of approval and decline of approval for the above matters with respective supporting reasons and the opinions of
opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the information and exercise their rights to protect their own interests. They should also make
opinions to the public prosecutor for consideration of prosecution. This approach follows the check and balance principle within the judicial process. In such proceedings, the SEC can integrate collaboration
the above matters with respective supporting reasons, and clearly provide information to the bondholders together with the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore
the above matters with respective supporting reasons, and clearly provide information to the bondholders together with the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore
ordered CPAXT to further clarify related matters, for example, the Board of Directors’ opinions, the Audit Committee’s consideration for approval of the joint investment in The Happitat Project, the fair
cases of approval and decline of approval for the above matters with respective supporting reasons and the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to
of approval for the above matters with respective supporting reasons and the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the
respective supporting reasons and the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the information and exercise their rights to protect their own