Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
issuance of a writ of execution against the debtor under the procedures. 2. Cases after the verdict which are in the process of legal execution: 2.1 Sayam Hin Pradub Co., Ltd. is a debtor under the judgment
by public prosecutors, and the judicial discretion of the court in rendering a verdict, respectively._________________________
proceeded under the Bankruptcy Law. 02/07/2024 The Civil Court delivered The Appeal Court judgment upholding the Civil Court judgment.16/08/2022 The Civil Court delivered a judgment that all three
. 02/07/2024 The Civil Court delivered The Appeal Court judgment upholding the Civil Court judgment.16/08/2022 The Civil Court delivered a judgment that all three defendants, including Polaris
in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56(1)(2)(3)(4) and199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018, the
fine. The jail term was suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was
inquiry officer, the decision to prosecute by public prosecutors, and ultimately the judicial discretion of the court in rendering a verdict. In this regard, the SEC will monitor the progress of the ongoing