, Suwit, Wanna, Theerawat, Preyatada, Surachaste, Karoon and Sirichai colluded to send trading orders in a manner consistent with share price manipulation, causing the average daily trading volume to

found that {A} had been authorized by his client to make securities trading decisions on the client's behalf with high trading volume. The communication record showed that {A} traded the securities and

Conduct dated 14 October 2009. Kruawan had traded securities through her client?s account every business day. Her trading manner with high frequency and trading volume, when compared to the client?s credit

result, the price and trading volume of PICO’s shares were not in a normal market condition, and investors in general were misled to understand that a large number of investors were interested in buying

for a certain period of time and with high trading volume. Moreover, {A} admitted that he traded securities for a client without any order. Although this client notified him to stop trading, {A

prices. It was found that the information on the price and trading volume of Zipmex Token (ZMT) disclosed on *Zipmex’s digital asset exchange website was inaccurately and inconsistently presented to

in big volumes. Such trading manipulation took place during 10-27 September 2013, causing YCI price and trading volume to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. The wrongdoing was assisted

volume of such shares, and involved a series of continuous trading orders, with the intention to cause the share prices or trading volume to be inconsistent with the normal market conditions. The

submitted as a single order causing the price and trading volume of UNIQ shares to be inconsistent with normal market conditions. The UNIQ closing price increased over 3.8 times and average daily trading

activities of other persons or manipulating the closing share prices on certain days, with the intention to cause the SCN share prices and trading volume to be inconsistent with the normal market conditions