Following the concerns from the last public hearing in 2017 on the revision of the principles and regulations relating to the provident fund to resolve the issue that members did not have adequate

partial investment, granting the right of objection on material issues to REIT, having guidelines to resolve conflicts between REIT and investment partners, and providing a statement of opinions on

, which is deemed a refusal to resolve the case at the SEC level.The SEC has therefore submitted a written request to the public prosecutor to file a lawsuit against Miss Paranya in the Civil Court

so, which is deemed a refusal to resolve the case at the SEC level.Accordingly, the SEC has submitted a written request to the public prosecutor for filing a lawsuit against Mr. Suthee in the Civil

the trading of any derivatives contract shall submit to the SEC Office an application for approval of the forms and terms of such derivatives contract via Form 67- 1 together with the evidentiary

purchased is overevaluate regarding to inaccurate raw material price specified in fuel sale contracts made by Mr. Sutat Suklert to SK1. Mr. Saran suggested Mr. Sutat enter into the contract and the contract

inconsistent with the facts to deceive other persons. He committed a fraud by misappropriating money of Nongree Power Plants Company Limited (a 100-percent subsidiary of IEC) through a contract with Energy

Power Plants Company Limited (a 100-percent subsidiary of IEC) through a contract with ESES for the construction of a building and the installation of electricity-generating machinery at the exaggerated

Limited (a 100-percent subsidiary of IEC) through a contract with ESES for the construction of a building and the installation of electricity-generating machinery at the exaggerated price of 58 million baht

inconsistent with the facts to deceive other persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating money of IEC through the transactions related to the outsourcing contract with Bann Tongkum Co., Ltd. where