Section 58 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the SEC has instructed NUSA to clarify the following matters:   1. The action plan for NUSA to support liquidity or the ability to repay

affect the shareholders’ rights, benefits and decisions significantly, the SEC, by virtue of Section 58 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), has ordered OTO’s BOD to make

and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), instructs NUSA to clarify the following information:          1. The impact of the lawsuits filed with the Civil Court by NUSA’s shareholders on petition for

B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He earlier agreed to enter the settlement procedure; but later declined to do so. The criminal case has not been regarded as settled. As a result, the SEC has to file the

Bangkok, March 22, 2016 ? The SEC is seeking public comments on the proposals to amend several provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and the Provident Fund (PVD) Act

conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) as follows:? Sagha Sakulekpaisan or ?Here-Tee? (former name: Chakchai or Thana Sae Jiem) was convicted on three counts with one-year

work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a result, the Settlement Committee imposed the fine of 1,101,000 baht on AEC

inappropriate and illegal actions by its employees.  The aforesaid defects of AEC work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a

million Baht or 58.85%. The revenue in this segment was lower since the Company terminated contract with the both customers on May 2018, and September 2018 because they breached the agreements. 1.3 Sea

Baht or 58.85%. The revenue in this segment was lower since the Company terminated contract with the both customers on May 2018, and September 2018 because they breached the agreements. 1.3 Sea Freight