the date of the withdrawal. The provisions of Section 103 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the persons with whom the securities company enters into an agreement allowing such persons as well as those who
the date of the withdrawal. The provisions of Section 103 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the persons with whom the securities company enters into an agreement allowing such persons as well as those who
Holding, causing damage to both companies. Additionally, Mr. Somchai, authorized to sign for money withdrawal on behalf of the company, misappropriated B30 million which had disappeared from SECC Holding’s
concerning money withdrawal to mislead others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Section 315 of the SEA in conjunction with Sections 307, 308, 311, and 312 of the SEA. SEC Act S.315 Criminal
to the Fund. Furthermore, the company aided and abetted Mr. Maris Tarab and Mr. Burim Chombhubol in falsifying documents and evidence concerning money withdrawal to mislead others. The aforesaid acts
improvements of certain areas in T.U. Dome Fund assets, which was, however, incorrect and caused damage to the Fund. Furthermore, they falsified documents and evidence concerning money withdrawal to mislead
improvements of certain areas in T.U. Dome Fund assets, which was, however, incorrect and caused damage to the Fund. Furthermore, they falsified documents and evidence concerning money withdrawal to mislead
to her own account. Moreover, there was a cash withdrawal of 1 million baht at a bank counter for which the client had signed on the withdrawal slip in advance without writing down a specific amount
client’s account to her own account. Moreover, there was a cash withdrawal of 1 million baht at a bank counter for which the client had signed on the withdrawal slip in advance without writing down a
benefits of a derivatives business operator or in connection with derivatives business in a position or a nature of work related to derivatives trading, solicitation or provision of advice relating to