) (%) 44.83 46.08 3) Return on Equity *** (%) 10.59 9.43 4) Return on Assets *** (%) 6.28 5.75 5) EBITDA * (Million Baht) 2,611 2,557 6) EBITDA to Total Assets (%) 2.53 2.67 7) Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.72
6.26 5) EBITDA * (Million Baht) 2,517 1,991 6) EBITDA to Total Assets (%) 2.61 2.13 7) Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.51 0.53 8) Debt Service Coverage Ratio (Times) 6.09 5.18 9) Book Value per Share
* (Million Baht) 9,218 9,324 6) EBITDA to Total Assets (%) 9.67 9.87 7) Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.49 0.54 8) Debt Service Coverage Ratio (Times) 1.58 3.27 9) Book Value per Share (Baht) 43.63 42.98 * Not
10.21 4) Return on Assets ** (%) 7.80 8.33 5) EBITDA * (Million THB) 2,870 2,834 6) EBITDA to Total Assets (%) 2.82 2.77 7) Debt to Equity Ratio (Times) 0.75 0.70 8) Debt Service Coverage Ratio (Times
Power Company Limited (XPCL) and Nam Lik 1 Power Company Limited (NL1PC), the total equity capacity of 392 Megawatts will generate the revenue to GPSC in 2019. The update of projects under construction is
Power Company Limited (XPCL) and Nam Lik 1 Power Company Limited (NL1PC), the total equity capacity of 392 Megawatts will generate the revenue to GPSC in 2019. The update of projects under construction is
recorded in 2018. หนา้ 10 4.2.2 Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity Consolidated Unit: Baht million 2019 2019 Change (% yoy) Liabilities Debt issued and borrowing 75,687.52 57,709.28 31.15 Accrued interest
(0.19) (0.92) Debt service coverage ratio (Cash Basis)7 times 0.07 0.25 (0.02) (0.05) (0.09) Dividend payout ratio8 % 80.79 97.77 309.91 N/A N/A Interest Bearing Debt to equity 9 times 1.39 1.38 2.04 1.32
ratio6 times 3.58 5.54 0.37 (0.19) (0.92) Debt service coverage ratio (Cash Basis)7 times 0.07 0.25 (0.02) (0.05) (0.09) Dividend payout ratio8 % 80.79 97.77 309.91 N/A N/A Interest Bearing Debt to equity
Shareholders' Equity in the amount of 4,705.4 million baht, an increase of 41.8 million baht or 0.9%. The company also had Debt to Equity ratio (D/E) equivalent to 2.39 times, which slightly increased compared