that  he continued to submit trading orders in the same manner. The act of Surin constituted a violation of Section 244/3 and will be subject to punishment under Section 296, Section 296/1, and

Bangkok, September 11, 2014 ?The SEC is seeking public comment on draft regulations on termination of listed company?s duty to disclose information under  Section 56 and duty of directors and

by Noppawan and Viroj who allowed their separate trading accounts to be used for the YCI transactions in exchange for compensation.The aforesaid offenses were in violation of Section 243 of the

offence under Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/10 and Section 89/11, and liable to the penalties under the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. The

, Pongsachalerm and Chaiwat?s actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and thus liable to

in benefits from trading of KARAT shares. Apichart?s actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and

derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of  an imprisonment up to

Section 243(1) in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code, while {F} {G} {H} {I} and {J} violated

statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of

prices, while Prayuth and Naruephol used their own accounts to manipulate the SECC share. Porntep?s and Arada?s actions were liable to contravention of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and