disclosed information through the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) Electronic Information System that it had defaulted on the bills of exchange (B/E) and https://www.sec.or.th/EN/Pages/News_Detail.aspx?SECID

conjunction with Section 244/6(2)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, with the penalties prescribed in

According to the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the SEC’s further investigation, facts and evidence were found leading to the belief that Worawoot, COL director and the

According to a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) in 2023 and the SEC’s further investigation, it was revealed that during the period between 2 – 9 September 2022, the four

244/6 (as the case may be) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code to the ECD inquiry officials on 10 February 2023*  |The SEC’s

Laksana and Sommart in this case is deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code which is subject to

Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the SEC?s further investigation, it was found that on 20 January 2014 Rapi, then managing director and major shareholder of RASA, reported to the SET that the company neither

shares to 30 million shares. Such offences were in violation of Section 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to

of Section 243(1)(2) and Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. In addition, certain evidence pointed that securities trading orders executed through others? trading