business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court
result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the
offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
were arranged by Mr. Saran. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 and section 352 353 and 354 of Penal Code in conjunction with section
significantly higher price of 70 million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew Pariswong, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat Bhudithaiyarasak, who were Energy System
price of 70 million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew Pariswong, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat Bhudithaiyarasak, who were Energy System Engineering and
Bhudithaiyarasak, who were ESES directors, assisted and supported the execution of such trading transactions. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 in
price of 70 million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew Pariswong, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat, who were ESES director, assisted and supported the
price of 70 million baht, which created an unlawful benefit for Mr. Bhusana. Miss Ploykaew Pariswong, Miss Kornrawan Sunprasert and Mr. Nanthawat Bhudithaiyarasak, who were ESES director, assisted and