be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about
Stock Exchange of Thailand on 13 March 2017 and his statement at the press conference the following day when he reassured that the foreign borrowers were unrelated to him. As a result, he is liable to
order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate fraud in accordance with Section 90 of the Penal Code. In addition, he was also sentenced to serve 8-year
and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed
of the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification as follows : (1) the reviewed financial statements for Q3/2019 (2) the interim management discussion and analysis (“MD
letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992) (“SEC Act”) instructing the directors of EARTH to provide explanation about
letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992) (“SEC Act”) instructing the directors of EARTH to provide explanation about
SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992) (“SEC Act”) instructing the directors of EARTH to provide explanation about the reasonability
Inquiry Official Dated 30/04/2001