delay.According to the auditor?s report, accounting policies were improperly used in the annual financial statements for the year 2014, whereby Smart Traffic Co., Ltd., an EIC affiliate, failed to record allowance
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
consultant for four years and eight months. They were the employees of KTB Securities (Thailand) Co., Ltd., while the misconduct occurred. The SEC learned of Panadda case from a complaint filed against her and
and lease back of premises categorized as operating lease in the annual financial statements. The SEC is of the opinion that the above transactions were in fact a collateral loan, not an outright
Annop and Kamthorn were considered trading securities in concealment to mislead the public in contravention of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and
orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found
the general public to believe that UMI shares were purchased or sold in great volume at that time which was not consistent with the normal market conditions on purpose to lure the general public to
, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and