{X1} Company shares in his own securities trading account by using the aforementioned information learnt during his directorship in {X1} Company. {A} and {B}'s actions were in violation of Section 241
and volume. In addition, a number of trading orders were also matched within the group to induce the public into the trading of RICH shares. Previously, the Settlement Committee on January 22, 2014
the aforementioned information learnt from her position of TUCC chief finance officer. Yongyuth and Vorapin?s actions were in violation of Section 241 which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of
securities trading as well as amount of securities and prices, all of which were acknowledged by the client's authorized person. Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of
trading orders. In this regard, {A} and {B} actions were deemed the violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of
Bangkok, July 2, 2015 - The SEC suspended four investment consultants for misconduct concerning share price manipulation. Those suspended were {A} and {B}, securities investment consultants and ex
Bangkok, July 8, 2015 ? The SEC suspended three investment consultants for making trading decisions on the clients? behalf. Those investment consultants were Ashiya Ashiyakul, a former capital market
Bangkok, July 8, 2015 - The SEC suspended three investment consultants for making trading decisions on the clients' behalf. Those investment consultants were {A}, a former capital market investment
? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain. This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of
other persons? accounts to purchase and sell AMC shares in concealment and on a continual basis during 13 September ? 16 November 2006 to mislead the general public to believe that the AMC shares were