Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
Shia Co. for supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht
supervising the construction. Later, it was found that there was no actual construction under the contract; however, the construction cost was paid with a total amount of 27.5 million baht. In addition, ACAP
or showed prices and trading volumes that is not actually occur during 2021 - 2022. Such information disclosure could mislead investors about the actual trading volumes or prices. This case is in the
. As a result, JKN’s financial statements reflected inflated revenue and liabilities. Additionally, it was found that royalty payables were recorded inaccurately, not corresponding to the actual
. As a result, JKN’s financial statements reflected inflated revenue and liabilities. Additionally, it was found that royalty payables were recorded inaccurately, not corresponding to the actual
baht, and subsequently resold those shares to CMO for 65 million baht, a price significantly higher than the actual market value, causing damage to the company. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr