gas tanks from PICNI and made false entries in the accounting document with an intention to deceive others. He also recorded false revenues in the ledger and used such numbers in the company’s financial
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
price, which consequently caused damage to RAM primarily worth more than 300 million baht. He also received benefits from other relevant acts. Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in
benefits and long-term returns. Gilt Edge also advertised that the company had a team of professional and experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable
trading shares in the SET. He also gained benefits from which his IFEC shares of more than 57.46 million used as the collateral for his margin trading were not subject to force selling. As a result, he
facility in Ban Bueng District, Chonburi Province, at an unreasonably high price. They also approved payments from IEC to NT Engine for the arrangement of waste disposal rights, despite IEC having requested