-General The Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Office) We, [Name of the juristic person or non-juristic group of persons in Thai and English], having an office at
Exchange Commission (SEC Office) In this Application, we Full name (in Thai) Full name (in English) Passport No. E-mail Address Mobile phone As a user of SEC Account with the duty related to submission of
Exchange Commission (SEC Office) In this Application, we Full name (in Thai) Full name (in English) Passport No. E-mail Address Mobile phone As a user of SEC Account with the duty related to submission of
? 23 July 2014 before the company disclosed the Q2 operating results via the SET. Assavin?s offence was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) and liable to the
, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The findings previously led to the sanctions imposed on ING Funds, Maris and Burim. In this connection, the SEC further probed into the case and found that from January 5
were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code
in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the criminal fining
agreed that Mr. Anurak would perform as a market maker to provide liquidity to Bitkub Exchange, and Bitkub would provide financial support to Mr. Anurak for the performance of liquidity providing. During
agreed that Mr. Anurak would perform as a market maker to provide liquidity to Bitkub Exchange, and Bitkub would provide financial support to Mr. Anurak for the performance of liquidity providing. Between