contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and
’ securities trading accounts by allowing others to use his trading account. the special case inquiry official dismissed the case because the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction
judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange
Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act of 1992
accounts. the special case inquiry official dismissed the case because the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal
rendering service increase 1 8 . 3 4 million baht or 1 0 0 % due to the subsidiaries terminated rental agreement of Khum Khan Toke and operate by itself. 1.5) Other revenue decrease 3.73 million baht or 30.47
million baht to ESES. Later the contract was terminated but there was no construction and installation. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 308 311
December 2018, the public prosecutor filed a lawsuit against Suphanan with the Civil Court in the Black Case No. Por. 7633/2561. On 12 November 2019, the Civil Court dismissed the case in the Red Case No
with Section 311 of the SEA. Previously, the Supreme Court had dismissed Nuprapat case due to his death. Information contained in this news release is as of the aforementioned release date. For those