CMO shares acquired during the latter period.The aforesaid actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed

had not been sufficient.   This caused the client about 3,000,000 Baht in damage.  In this regard, the aforesaid actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and (2) of the Notification of Capital Market

shares through Ziriwat?s securities trading account. Their actions were considered as taking an advantage over other investors due to their use of non-public information on Pulto LNG Project value where

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr. Suthisak Lohsawat and a juristic person whose major shareholders

(AMR). These actions included placing buy or sell orders designed to artificially inflate prices, submitting bids that hindered others from making their own buy orders, placing small-volume buy orders to

channel anytime. {A}'s actions were deemed non-compliance with investor contact's standards of conduct of Clause 14(7) of the SEC Notification No. SorKhor 49/2552 Re: Approval for Investor Contacts and

revocation for actions that do not significantly affect operational systems or service delivery.   In any case, digital asset business operators still have the duty to maintain qualifications related to

** had purchased land for a power plant construction in a corrupt manner to seek unlawful gain. The SEC’s investigation revealed actions that could constitute offenses under the Securities and Exchange Act

opening or closing prices of the securities –resulting in unusual increases in the prices and trading volumes of all four securities beyond normal market conditions, etc.Patcharadanai’s actions above were

/2001 2. Notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission  SorNor. 12/2545 Determination of Rules and Procedures for Actions by Management Companies against Incorrect Value of