launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme

-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned

with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating

known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in

specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.246 and 247 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated

period specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. SEC Act S.246 and 247 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry

token named MRC coin, which is a utility token that the underlying rights cannot be readily exercised on the issuance date, to the public without an approval from the SEC Office. The Court of Appeal

adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant’s act constituted

under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act

17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act violating