reference. 2 Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 84/2552 Re: Custody of Assets of Clients by Licensed Derivatives Brokers _____________ By virtue of Section 18, Section 33 and
reference. Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 84/2552 Re: Custody of Assets of Clients by Licensed Derivatives Brokers _____________ By virtue of Section 18, Section 33 and
the first issue to be used as working capital for the company. 8 Board’s Opinion The Board of Directors considered the proposed connected transactions to be appropriate, due to provide VIBHA sufficient
. Suppaluek Na Songkla, Mr. Ittidet Phonin and Miss Nittaya Na Songkla offered company to buy SUTG stock for 132,000 units whereas 66% of total paid-up capital of SUTG. Main reason of the deal is to come back
conditions stated therein. The proposed sell-down of the Units is strictly a f inancing exercise to fund, amongst other things, working capital needs and to pay the Company’s indebtedness and liabilit ies
stated therein. The sale price was determined through a book building process. The proposed sell-down of the Units is strictly a financing exercise to fund, amongst other things, working capital needs and
transaction on disposition of assets under the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorJor. 20/2551 Re: Rules on Entering into Material Transactions Deemed as Acquisition or Disposal of
establishing a hospital 150 beds in Vientiane Province, Lao PDR. The budget of this project about 1,200 million baht. Land 420 million baht Building 530 ,, Equipment 200 ,, Working Capital 50 ,, Total 1,200
purpose of establishing a hospital 150 beds in Vientiane Province, Lao PDR. The budget of this project about 1,200 million baht. Land 420 million baht Building 530 ,, Equipment 200 ,, Working Capital 50