containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the
quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of
dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
pay an equal civil penalty of 333,333.33 baht. In addition, since the offenses in this case are related to unfair trading activity, which is a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E
Act B.E. 2542 (1999), SEC has reported the case to the AMLO for consideration of further action. ________________________ Note: * Details in SEC News No. 56/2563 published on 16 March 2020
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee has therefore imposed a separate fine of 500,000 baht each on NEWS and Mr. Arak for failing to order or take action in
public. The said action was in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court