was due to the changes in the Labor Protection Act This was one-time expense in the Income Statement, but no impact to Cash Flow due to its non-cash item. Compared to last year, the Company recognized
compliance with the Labor Protection Act, effective on 5 May 2019); - a provision for loss on litigation from reversal of judgment by the Supreme Court of 831 million Baht, in compliance with the Thai
Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best
Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best
Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best
Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best
Digital Asset Business Registered Person Secondary Market and Related Entities Enforcement Class Action Prevention of Unfair Securities Trading Practices Discussion Rule Making Process Handbooks / Best
Discussion and Analysis of quarter 1 /2020 2 | p a g e Last year, the Company was affected by the amendment to the labour protection act. As a result, the products cost increased from the provision of Baht
long-term employee benefit (Labor Protection No. 7, B.E.2019) in Q2/2019. Other Transaction In Q2/2020, there were Baht 2.1 Million and Baht 4.0 Million from revenue and expenses from the office building
as the Labor Protection Act (No. 7) B.E. 2562 and has set aside loss on devaluation of obsolete, defective and slow-moving inventories so on. Net Profit and Net Profit Margin For the year ended