Exchange Commission No. Kor Thor. 9/2556 Re: Segregation and Management of Client’s Assets In Case of Intermediary Being under Receivership by Court Order _____________________________ By virtue of Section 9
activities are liable to be an operation of digital asset exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree, for which XT .COM has not obtained a license, in violation of Section 26, and subject to
financial statements and deceitful acts towards the public under Section 312, Section 89/7 in conjunction with Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 and Section 306 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
? 23 July 2014 before the company disclosed the Q2 operating results via the SET. Assavin?s offence was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) and liable to the
failure to comply with the SEC?s order, the company and its responsible management are liable to violation of Section 58 (3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) with penalties under Section
. (FOCUS) share price during April 24-25, 2008. His offense is in violation of Section 243 (1), Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in conjunction with Section 86 of the
normal market condition became affected during 9 January - 28 February 2013.Such offences were in violation of Section 243 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83
$110,274.67 US which is in contravention of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 and Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code.On March 28, 2013, the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court sentenced Ravi
37,849.50 Baht SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section Section 242(1), in conjunction with Section 243(1) and in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code Civil Action Dated 18/03/2025
investigative expenses in an amount of 37,849.00 Baht SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section Section 242(1), in conjunction with Section 244(3) and in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code Civil