in his capacity as the responsible person for the operation of Zipmex, which included ordering or acting and omitting to order or failing to act in any way that caused Zipmex to commit offenses in
cash or transferred the money to the juristic person claimed to be an agent from Hong Kong SAR or through currency exchange company in Thailand.According to the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), any
the purpose of law enforcement according to the authority of the three agencies. This includes executing the case with the fined person in a criminal case in order to effectively seize property or
concealing the identity of the person who was the real user of those accounts.Pattanapong?s action was deemed to be in violation of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the
considering which act of the person giving advice or the owner of the website or electronic media is or is not liable to be an undertaking of securities business in the category of investment advisory or an
in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in
Memorandum in relation to Related Parties Transaction Re: the Disposal of Rights under Loan Agreement, Share Pledge Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding re: the Feasibility Study for the Solar Power Plant
receiving the official notification of auction result AWN is required to fulfill the terms and conditions set by the NBTC including making payment in order to be officially granted the licenses. Hence, the